Apple II Infinitum -- rinse, repeat

Fifty years ago, a pair of college dropouts named Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak fundamentally shifted human history. The significance of 1976 to Apple Computers cannot be overstated: it was the literal ground zero of the personal computing revolution. On April 1, 1976, Apple Computer was formed, and by July, the duo unveiled the Apple I at the Homebrew Computer Club. Selling for a diabolical $666.66, the Apple I was just a bare motherboard. But it funded Wozniak’s next masterpiece: the 1977 Apple II, a fully realized, consumer-friendly machine featuring color graphics, expansion slots, and an integrated keyboard.

Fast forward to July 14–19, 2026. While modern Apple users await iterative upgrades to sleek aluminum slabs, retrocomputing diehards are descending upon the University of Illinois Springfield for KansasFest (KFest) 2026. Now in its 38th consecutive year, KFest remains the ultimate pilgrimage for hackers, programmers, and enthusiasts keeping the 8-bit dream alive.

Inside KFest 2026: Celebrations and Legends

This year’s convention is a historic milestone, marking the 40th anniversary of the Apple IIGS, the 16-bit pinnacle of the Apple II line released in 1986.

The event features a packed schedule of legendary guests, collaborative hackathons, and hardware swap meets:

  • In-Person Keynote: Apple Employee #12, Dan Kottke, is headlining the event live to share stories from the foundational garage days of Apple.
  • Virtual Engineering InsightsDan Hillman, the engineer who co-led the development of the Mega II chip (which squeezed an entire Apple IIe onto a single piece of silicon), is making a rare virtual appearance.
  • The Global Gathering: For those unable to travel to Illinois, KFest 2026 is also hosting an official virtual-only weekend event on July 31 – August 1, 2026.

A History Born of Crisis

KFest wasn't always an independent nonprofit. It originally launched in 1989 as an official Apple II developers' conference organized by Resource Central, a publisher of Apple II magazines. When Apple decided to completely discontinue the Apple IIGS in late 1992 and the final Apple IIe in November 1993, corporate support evaporated. The market plummeted, and Resource Central faced a severe financial crisis by 1995.

Refusing to let the platform vanish, a passionate community volunteer committee took over the reins in 1995. They managed the logistics, housing, and speaker schedules out of pure love for the architecture. To ensure its long-term survival, the convention officially incorporated as a non-profit corporation, KansasFest Inc., in 2015.

Over the decades, KFest has relied heavily on grassroots support and regular community sponsors. Entities like A2Central.com (the premier hub for Apple II news), retro-hardware vendors, and individual community patrons provide the financial backing needed to rent university dorms, fund speaker travel, and subsidize student admissions.

Why the Apple II Line Still Dominates Retrocomputing

How does a computer line discontinued for more than three decades still maintain a dominant grip on the retrocomputing landscape? The answer lies in Steve Wozniak’s masterful, open-architecture design.

Unlike Steve Jobs’ vision of a locked-down, appliance-like Macintosh, Wozniak insisted the Apple II feature eight internal expansion slots. This design made the computer virtually un-killable. If a component failed or became obsolete, a user could simply pull off the lid and swap it out. That structural choice created an open invitation for hackers to experiment—an invitation that remains open today.

Rather than sitting under glass in museums, the Apple II continues to see breathtaking new hardware and software development:

1. Cutting-Edge Modern Hardware

Hobbyists don’t use fragile 5.25-inch floppy disks anymore. Today's Apple II computers are augmented with modern tech:

  • Solid-State Storage: CompactFlash and SD card adapters mimic traditional floppy drives, allowing users to load thousands of software titles instantly.
  • FPGA and Chip Replacements: Developers are successfully using field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) to build drop-in replacements for obsolete Apple custom chips, like the MMU and IOU, ensuring the physical machines can run for another 50 years.
  • Network Capabilities: Peripheral cards give these 1 MHz machines the ability to connect to modern Wi-Fi networks and surf the text-based web via TCP/IP protocols.

2. Radical Software Engineering

The software scene is equally vibrant, proving that 48KB of RAM is more than enough space for modern genius.

  • Bringing Swift to the 8-Bit Era: In a stunning feat of modern software engineering, developer Yeo Kheng Meng successfully built a development environment that ports Apple’s modern Swift programming language to run on the 6502 processor of the original Apple II and IIe.
  • Demanding Demos and Games: New operating system tweaks, graphical demos, and complex homebrew indie games are released annually at KFest, squeezing visual tricks out of the machine that engineers in the 1970s thought were mathematically impossible.

The Eternal Machine

Steve Wozniak built the Apple II to be a tool for ordinary people to learn, modify, and master technology. By keeping the hood open, he created a community that refuses to let the machine die.

As KFest 2026 kicks into high gear, it is clear that the legacy started in a California garage in 1976 isn't just history—it's a living, breathing, coding reality.


Dependence Day - AI Hegemony

 

Recent college graduates face technology conscription: the expectation to feed, train, and validate the very AI models designed to automate their future career paths.

  • The Flashpoint: Intellectual extraction and job devaluation. Graduates see AI corporations scraping human creativity, engineering, and writing without equitable compensation, creating an unstable economic future.
  • The Tipping Point: Instead of burning draft cards, modern graduates are engaging in digital resistance—refusing to apply to major AI firms, deploying data-poisoning tools to protect their portfolios, and organizing labor walkouts over algorithmic ethics.
  • The Split: A growing contingent of young professionals is choosing to boycott corporate AI completely. They are migrating to decentralized networks, open-source communities, and localized worker-owned tech collectives.

Direct Comparison: Two Historical Divorces

The table below breaks down how these two systemic walkouts contrast in their execution, motives, and final resolutions:

Feature The 1969 YAF Split The Recent College Grad / AI Split
Primary Catalyst State conscription to fight the Vietnam War. Economic displacement and automated exploitation.
Opposing Authority Traditionalist, Cold War conservative leaders. Big Tech executives and corporate venture capitalists.
Act of Defiance Physically burning a draft card on the convention floor. Data-poisoning, model boycotts, and refusing corporate recruitment.
Immediate Result A literal walkout from the convention hall. A refusal to enter the mainstream tech workforce pipeline.
Long-term Alternative Founding the U.S. Libertarian Party and independent caucuses. Building decentralized tech, localized cooperatives, and open-source models.

The Fundamental Contrast: Ideology vs. Survival

The core distinction between these two historic events lies in the nature of the stakes.

The 1969 split was primarily ideological and philosophical. The libertarians in YAF revolted because they refused to compromise their purist principles regarding individual liberty, free markets, and anti-interventionism. They were willing to forfeit their political capital within the broader conservative movement to maintain their philosophical purity.

Conversely, the current split between university graduates and AI firms is born out of material and economic survival. Graduates are not merely debating abstract theories of liberty in a convention hall; they are defending their literal livelihoods, the value of their degrees, and the ownership of their intellectual labor.

When the 1969 libertarians walked out under the St. Louis Gateway Arch, they did so to build a new political vehicle. When today's graduates walk away from AI tech corporations, they do so to build an alternative economy before the old one automates them out entirely.

Mythos and Fables Indeed

In April, the makers of Claude shared that the company's new AI model (Mythos 5) was too dangerous to release to the public. Weeks later, thanks to some tweaks, the new model (called Fable 5) was released to the public. Now, it has been announced that "Anthropic has suspended its powerful new AI model after US authorities raised security concerns just days following its public release."

I find some irony in these AI names. Mythos and Fables indeed.

MORE    Anthropic's Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5 AI suspended over security fears  

AI Overviews and Data Center Power

data center

A U.S. Amazon data center
Image: Tedder - CC BY-SA 4.0

 

David Pogue on Substack writes that "When you do a Google search these days, you generally see an AI Overview panel above the search results. It’s intended to summarize the answers to your query, so you don’t have to click any links. The first problem: By Google’s own calculations, the AI Overviews are incorrect 28% of the time. The bigger problem: AI is an environmental disaster. It’s already a monstrous energy hog, and its appetite is doubling every six months."

 He gives some data about this data center power situation:

  • 4,200 data centers that AI companies have built and 1,500 more are going up as you read this
  • By 2030, AI will consume 945 terawatt-hours of electricity. That is enough to power every household in California, Texas, Florida, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania combined. Almost incomprehensible.
  • 60% of that power will come from polluting power sources.
  • Don’t care about the environment? How about your power bill? AI’s power needs have driven up electricity costs as much as 15% in the last year, with another 8.5% hike coming by the end of 2026.
  • Add in more rolling blackouts during heat waves this summer.

But it’s not just Google, because almost every big company is eager to add AI to their products.

Pogue's note of hope is that a few people, like Sheila Morovati, are trying to make AI optional. Morovati is the founder and president of a nonprofit called HabitsofWaste.org. Her movement is called Opt-In AI with a goal of no AI at all unless someone asks for it. The default setting should be the most sustainable and least annoying option.

More at Rise Up, People! Make AI Optional! - David Pogue